<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SlopYard Blog</title><link>https://blog.slopyard.net/</link><description>Recent content on SlopYard Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.slopyard.net/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Assumed Intent</title><link>https://blog.slopyard.net/2026/10/assumed-intent/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://blog.slopyard.net/2026/10/assumed-intent/</guid><description>I’m quite tired of specifying what I do not want to all the LLMs.
Because of their incentives being turned to 11 for achieving the goal with minimal user input, they will assume a lot. Most of everything really, because any software specification is generated ad-hoc in the programmer’s brain.
Still, I find it infuriating that Gemini always assumes that I want to have some demo mode in everything I make.</description></item></channel></rss>